(Note the timely inclusion of the USS Saratoga, CVN 60.  But I have no idea where that chopper could be coming from – oh, wait, 85th Avenue.)

Note the above-ground tracks in Berkeley.  And holy lots of white people on that train. Sex Pigeon, if your telepathy trucker hat has an alternate history setting, what are they thinking?

In all honesty we got a pretty good deal of this, though BART along Geary/Broadway and on the Golden Gate Bridge would have been a pretty epic ride. (And a crosstown BART down Divisidero-Castro-Noe-30th Street-SFO would work for me too. Just don’t turn off that tunneling machine, Gavin.)

Makes you wonder what the bullet train to LA will actually look like 50 years from now.  Some space-blogger will be all, “Ha ha, look at this Burrito Justice idiot who said the train would go just 250 miles an hour when in fact it arrives in San Francisco BEFORE IT ACTUALLY LEAVES LA!”

Last month I asked David to add my favorite map of the Mission to his Google Earth collection, the 1859 US Coast Survey Map of San Francisco (which actually shows the state of the city in 1857). While there are several other maps available in Google Earth (specifically the 1869 Coast Survey and the 1915 map), they all show the street grid we know and love today, or like the 1853 Coast Survey, don’t go further south than the Mission Dolores itself.  The glorious 1859 map shows open fields, streams and lakes in the Mission we inhabit today.

Anyway, the 1859 map is sweet — click on this link and then open it up in Google Earth (or navigate there via the Gallery Layer).  Here’s a closeup, with today’s streets as an overlay. Click to zoom.

Using the map, I traced the creek that ran near 18th St. Below are views looking west from Google Earth.

Old 18th St Creek, Castro to Dolores Park

It eventually fed into Mission Creek.

Old 18th St Creek, Dolores Park to Treat

Ever wonder why Treat is on that funny angle? Now you know – it ran along the edge of Mission Creek!

Here’s the .kml file if you want to download and use it as a layer in Google Earth. Brown is marsh on the 1859 map, and blue is the Mission Creek. The green area was “The Willows Pleasure Gardens” – possibly a beer garden!  Click to zoom…

The Willows, 18th and Valencia

(There’s no date on this photo, but check out the flag — the middle row of stars looks shorter than the others, so I think this is from before there were 35 states (7×5) though how many I can’t quite tell.  And the star field orientation is flipped — 7 rows, not 7 columns as was typical in that era. While it could be the 31 star flag for California’s entry, that was from 1851-1858 and was pretty asymmetric.  32 (1858-1859), 33 (1859-1861), or 34 (1861-1863) are more likely, but I digress…)

You can see that The Willows is in quite a low area, right where there was once a lake. Mission Dolores was build a few blocks from the edge of a lake that was gone by the time of the 1859 map. Laguna de los Dolores, amongst other names, seems to have filled itself in after the time the Mission was established — it went from about 15th to 20th, from Valencia to Howard (here’s a higher rez version of the map Telestar provide to Mission Mission). This soft ground accounted for the Hotel Valencia at 19th sinking in the 1906 quake.

Where was this picture taken?  Since it looks like Mission Dolores is to the left of the flag, above the fence, I strongly suspect it was taken from the edge of the Union Race Course.   If so, then here’s the point of view:

WHAT

Race courses in the Mission?  Plural?  Yup, two — the Union, roughly bounded by 19th to 23rd, and Capp to Harrison:

and the Pioneer Race Course, between 24th to 26th, and Mission to Bryant.

The all-knowing BobbyO helped me find this advertisement for the Pioneer Course from 1853.

What’s interesting is the relative position of these two racetracks — they seem to have affected the layout of the San Francisco-San Jose railway that cut through the Mission!  Construction began  in 1861 between downtown and the Mission in 1860 and the line started operating in 1863/1864.

.kml for the Pioneer and Union racetracks for you personal Google Earth viewing pleasure.

If you look at the 1869 Coast Survey map, you first see the railway.  But in just 6 years after the completion of the SFJSRR, the city had already built around the tracks.

The train set a speed record:

The first full-sized steam locomotive produced in the state of California, an American 4-4-0, was built for the SF&SJRR by the Union Iron Works in San Francisco. It was appropriately named the “California”. Its inaugural run was August 30, 1865, during which it set a speed record of 67 mph (107 km/h).

Today, 144 years later, Caltrain’s top speed today is just 79 mph.  That’s just sad.

Allan, I think non-traditional burrito consumption timing is what got me through the Bush administration.

Thanks, SoCal and Central Valley on Prop h8te. L.A., I am severely disappointed in you. I’m not so sure I want that bullet train any more. We’re stopping it in Gilroy, and maybe sending it north to Portland/Seattle/Vancouver where people are nicer.

And you need 2/3rds to pass the BART extension to San Jose, but only 50% +1 to take away civil rights? WTF?

I would love nothing more than to take Caltrain, but it is just too slow. Given the time it takes to get to and from each station, I’m looking at a 2.5 hour trip each way, vs a 45 min to 1 hour drive. 79 mph? Baby bullet my ass. (And it doesn’t stop in Santa Clara — what’s up with that?)

At no point should I be able to drive faster than its top speed. Trains were going 79 mph 100 years ago. This is embarrassing for California – take the Shinkansen or the TGV and see what I mean. My best trip ever? Paris to London through the Chunnel in the bar car. I got more work done than I ever do on airplanes. Plus, the bar car.

Anyway, I am a big fan of a true bullet train (200 mph+) down through San Jose to LA. 20 minutes to Palo Alto, 30 minutes to San Jose, under 3 hours to LA. And one day it will go up to Sacramento, another drive that sucks. (Could the Capitol Corridor Amtrak be any slower through Richmond to Benicia?)

I love the videos on this page of the train whipping by cars on the highway and the existing Caltrain:

http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/map.htm

If I saw that zooming by, I would be annoyed enough to take the train. And I am sure we could add a good taco truck car.

Some good analysis over at the Transbay Blog:

Anyway, vote yes on 1A and bring California trains into the 20th century.