<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cesar Chavez, the Friendly Road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/</link>
	<description>You can pry my burrito out of my cold, dead hand.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campos &#38; Company vs CPMC on St. Luke&#8217;s &#8211; Tonight at 6 PM &#171; Burrito Justice</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campos &#38; Company vs CPMC on St. Luke&#8217;s &#8211; Tonight at 6 PM &#171; Burrito Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] if not storefronts on whatever building is on Cesar Chavez &#8211; 2 story blank wall be damned.  Cesar Chavez city planners, where are you on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if not storefronts on whatever building is on Cesar Chavez &#8211; 2 story blank wall be damned.  Cesar Chavez city planners, where are you on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Luke&#8217;s Campus Community Forum, Tonight at 6pm &#171; Burrito Justice</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[St. Luke&#8217;s Campus Community Forum, Tonight at 6pm &#171; Burrito Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rather curious to see how they are going to reconcile the featureless walls with the city&#8217;s plans for Cesar Chavez. (And hey, how about a long [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rather curious to see how they are going to reconcile the featureless walls with the city&#8217;s plans for Cesar Chavez. (And hey, how about a long [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Luke&#8217;s Update &#8211; The Future Is In Your Hands &#171; Burrito Justice</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[St. Luke&#8217;s Update &#8211; The Future Is In Your Hands &#171; Burrito Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] livable streets, yet this design seems to ignore that.  How does the CPMC plan integrate with the Cesar Chavez Street redesign?  Beats [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] livable streets, yet this design seems to ignore that.  How does the CPMC plan integrate with the Cesar Chavez Street redesign?  Beats [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valencia Street Park - Alternative St. Luke&#8217;s Plan &#171; Burrito Justice</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valencia Street Park - Alternative St. Luke&#8217;s Plan &#171; Burrito Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] building on the doctor&#8217;s parking lot and over San Jose Ave, or the poor integration with the Cesar Chavez street improvement plan.) Secret CMPC plan to enrage neighbors, or just lazy?  Regardless, a better plan is in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] building on the doctor&#8217;s parking lot and over San Jose Ave, or the poor integration with the Cesar Chavez street improvement plan.) Secret CMPC plan to enrage neighbors, or just lazy?  Regardless, a better plan is in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Luke&#8217;s, Once and Future - Planning Meeting Tonight &#171; Burrito Justice</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[St Luke&#8217;s, Once and Future - Planning Meeting Tonight &#171; Burrito Justice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8212; just make it more friendly to the neighborhood, especially with all the effort going into redesigning Cesar Chavez &#8212; don&#8217;t make Cesar Chavez like the soulless Safeway wall on San Jose. Making a better [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; just make it more friendly to the neighborhood, especially with all the effort going into redesigning Cesar Chavez &#8212; don&#8217;t make Cesar Chavez like the soulless Safeway wall on San Jose. Making a better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TODAY&#8217;S MISSION: 02.25.09 &#124; Mission Loc@l</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TODAY&#8217;S MISSION: 02.25.09 &#124; Mission Loc@l]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Justice puts the incident into perspective with a look at past burrito misdeeds. BJ also give an informative report from Tuesday&#8217;s meeting of the Cesar Chavez design plan. __ include median, bike lanes, timed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Justice puts the incident into perspective with a look at past burrito misdeeds. BJ also give an informative report from Tuesday&#8217;s meeting of the Cesar Chavez design plan. __ include median, bike lanes, timed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny0</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnny0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I talked to the traffic guy afterwards (not one of the planners) and it sounded like they had in fact done pretty detailed traffic studies.  You&#039;re right, not well communicated by the planners though -- sounds like bureaucracy at work.

One thing he mentioned (that the planners didn&#039;t) was they were looking at timing lights to keep the traffic moving at a rate that won&#039;t fill up the left-hand turn pockets, as opposed to the &quot;let&#039;s turn every light red at the same time&quot; technology they have in place now.  I&#039;d guess this would be a slower average speed, but if it&#039;s more constant with fewer lights, I&#039;m up for that.

Regardless, more info on the traffic studies would be welcome. CC is pretty much a clusterfuck eastbound in the morning and westbound at night, and I really don&#039;t see it getting much worse.  If they can smooth the flow and get the left hand turners out of the way it will be a huge improvement IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talked to the traffic guy afterwards (not one of the planners) and it sounded like they had in fact done pretty detailed traffic studies.  You&#8217;re right, not well communicated by the planners though &#8212; sounds like bureaucracy at work.</p>
<p>One thing he mentioned (that the planners didn&#8217;t) was they were looking at timing lights to keep the traffic moving at a rate that won&#8217;t fill up the left-hand turn pockets, as opposed to the &#8220;let&#8217;s turn every light red at the same time&#8221; technology they have in place now.  I&#8217;d guess this would be a slower average speed, but if it&#8217;s more constant with fewer lights, I&#8217;m up for that.</p>
<p>Regardless, more info on the traffic studies would be welcome. CC is pretty much a clusterfuck eastbound in the morning and westbound at night, and I really don&#8217;t see it getting much worse.  If they can smooth the flow and get the left hand turners out of the way it will be a huge improvement IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFDoggy</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SFDoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The funniest part of the meeting was when the planners squirmed when asked about the impact on vehicle traffic (that is the thousands of people who use buses, trucks and cars to traverse CC every day).

The planners stated that the bike plan EIR had looked at eliminating a lane of traffice but were to timid to admit that the EIR shows that eliminating a lane will cause massive traffic jams.

The planners (as they have throughout the process) insisted that the plan would not significantly impact vehicle traffic, but admitted that they STILL have not done any traffic studies.  So basically the &quot;public&quot; part of this process is now complete, without the public ever having been informed of what the impact of the project will be.

These meetings are basically a joke.  The planners do not provide relevant information and dodge the tough questions. The whole process has had a pre-determined outcome.  I and others suggested that the planning department actually look at altnernative approaches to making CC safer and prettier, but these suggestions were curtly dismissed.

This plan was driven entirely by a few residents who live near CC.  They and the planning department apparently don&#039;t care that thousands more people depend on CC every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funniest part of the meeting was when the planners squirmed when asked about the impact on vehicle traffic (that is the thousands of people who use buses, trucks and cars to traverse CC every day).</p>
<p>The planners stated that the bike plan EIR had looked at eliminating a lane of traffice but were to timid to admit that the EIR shows that eliminating a lane will cause massive traffic jams.</p>
<p>The planners (as they have throughout the process) insisted that the plan would not significantly impact vehicle traffic, but admitted that they STILL have not done any traffic studies.  So basically the &#8220;public&#8221; part of this process is now complete, without the public ever having been informed of what the impact of the project will be.</p>
<p>These meetings are basically a joke.  The planners do not provide relevant information and dodge the tough questions. The whole process has had a pre-determined outcome.  I and others suggested that the planning department actually look at altnernative approaches to making CC safer and prettier, but these suggestions were curtly dismissed.</p>
<p>This plan was driven entirely by a few residents who live near CC.  They and the planning department apparently don&#8217;t care that thousands more people depend on CC every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny0</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnny0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More buildings sounds like expansion.  Plus more beds -- only 60 or so of the current 229 are being used.

Anyway, my issue is not with the expansion. It&#039;s about the abrupt transition from residential to hospital, as well as the unfriendly effect of buildings backed right up  to Cesar Chavez and Valencia.    

Pierre, do you live in the neighborhood?  If not, different points of view indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More buildings sounds like expansion.  Plus more beds &#8212; only 60 or so of the current 229 are being used.</p>
<p>Anyway, my issue is not with the expansion. It&#8217;s about the abrupt transition from residential to hospital, as well as the unfriendly effect of buildings backed right up  to Cesar Chavez and Valencia.    </p>
<p>Pierre, do you live in the neighborhood?  If not, different points of view indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre from Cathedral Hill</title>
		<link>http://burritojustice.com/2009/02/25/cesar-chavez-the-friendly-road/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierre from Cathedral Hill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burritojustice.wordpress.com/?p=1335#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, St. Luke&#039;s is not expanding. According to the CPMC 2008 Institutional Master Plan filed with the city, when it is built, the new 86 bed 100 foot hospital will replace the 229 bed 158 foot existing Main Hospital, which will be demolished and replaced with a 5 story expansion building. Whether it&#039;s good or bad is a question of point of view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, St. Luke&#8217;s is not expanding. According to the CPMC 2008 Institutional Master Plan filed with the city, when it is built, the new 86 bed 100 foot hospital will replace the 229 bed 158 foot existing Main Hospital, which will be demolished and replaced with a 5 story expansion building. Whether it&#8217;s good or bad is a question of point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

